A constitutional showdown has erupted after the Supreme Court upheld Donald Trump’s use of a “pocket rescission” to freeze $4 billion in foreign aid. The rarely used mechanism lets a president cancel funds if Congress doesn’t act before the fiscal year ends. In a 6–3 decision, the Court reversed a lower ruling that said only Congress could rescind appropriations, marking a major expansion of executive power.
The majority argued that limiting presidential discretion could hinder foreign policy, while dissenters warned the ruling erodes congressional authority. The decision challenges the 1974 Impoundment Control Act, reopening the door to executive impoundment. Supporters call it a restoration of presidential strength; critics see a dangerous tilt toward unchecked power. The outcome may redefine the balance between Congress and the presidency.
