President Donald Trump’s White House has sent termination notices to multiple U.S. Attorneys across the country who were appointed by former Democratic President Joe Biden, marking a sweeping purge of federal prosecutors as the new administration takes decisive steps to assert its authority over the Justice Department. The move has raised eyebrows among legal experts and former officials, as it deviates from the traditional practice of requesting resignations from holdover U.S. Attorneys, opting instead for abrupt dismissals.

In an email obtained by Reuters, the White House’s deputy director for the Office of Presidential Personnel notified the targeted officials of their immediate termination. “At the direction of President Donald J. Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as U.S. Attorney is terminated, effective immediately,” the email read. The terse and blunt nature of the communication was seen as a stark contrast to previous transitions, where incoming administrations typically allow U.S. Attorneys time to submit their resignations voluntarily.

While it was not immediately clear whether all remaining Biden-era U.S. Attorneys had received termination notices, reports indicate that a growing number of prosecutors from coast to coast—from Seattle to Maryland—have resigned or been forced out of their positions. The White House has so far remained silent on the matter, with no official response or clarification provided about the scope of the dismissals or the reasoning behind the abrupt firings.

Unprecedented Shake-up of U.S. Attorneys
Although it is customary for an incoming president to replace U.S. Attorneys from the previous administration, the process is generally carried out in a more orderly and measured fashion. Historically, a new president requests resignations from the holdovers, allowing for a period of transition before new appointments take effect. The decision to summarily fire these prosecutors without prior consultation or transition planning is an unusual step that legal experts say could create disruptions in key federal cases currently under prosecution.

The Trump administration’s decision to fire the attorneys rather than request their resignations has led to uncertainty regarding how the Justice Department will handle ongoing investigations and trials. U.S. Attorneys are responsible for prosecuting federal crimes, handling major criminal and civil cases, and overseeing law enforcement agencies in their respective districts. Sudden vacancies in these roles could cause delays in cases ranging from organized crime and drug trafficking to public corruption and white-collar crime.

Attorneys Forced Out Amid Disruptions
Among those fired was U.S. Attorney Tara McGrath of San Diego, a Biden appointee, whose office confirmed late Wednesday that she had received an official termination letter from the White House. Despite the abrupt end to her tenure, the letter reportedly included a brief note thanking McGrath for her service.

Another high-profile dismissal was U.S. Attorney Erek Barron of Maryland, who sent a farewell email to his office shortly after receiving his termination notice. “It has been an honor to lead such a talented and dedicated team,” Barron wrote in the email, a copy of which was reviewed by Reuters. He later confirmed his departure on LinkedIn, where he reflected on his time as Maryland’s top federal prosecutor.

Similarly, Ismail Ramsey, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California, confirmed his departure through an emailed statement, saying he had “concluded his leadership” of the office. Seattle-based U.S. Attorney Tessa Gorman also announced her resignation at the request of the president, according to a spokesperson for her office. Gorman had initially been appointed on an interim basis by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland and later by federal judges in the Western District of Washington.

Late Wednesday, Biden-appointed U.S. Attorney Dena King, who served as the top federal prosecutor for the Western District of North Carolina, also announced her resignation in response to the president’s directive.

At least two dozen Biden-appointed U.S. Attorneys had remained in their positions as of earlier this week, but with termination notices continuing to roll out, that number is rapidly dwindling. As of Thursday, at least three had still not confirmed whether they had been dismissed or remained in office.

Legal Experts Raise Concerns
Legal analysts and former Justice Department officials have expressed concerns over the abrupt firings, warning that such a move could create uncertainty within the federal prosecutorial system. U.S. Attorneys oversee major criminal cases, investigations, and national security matters, and sudden vacancies could potentially hinder ongoing prosecutions.

“It’s common for new administrations to make changes to the U.S. Attorney roster, but it’s highly unusual to see mass firings with no transition period or plan in place,” said Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. “This kind of disruption could cause significant delays in high-profile cases, particularly those involving organized crime, drug cartels, and public corruption.”

Some former officials have also pointed out that firing U.S. Attorneys without first securing Senate-confirmed replacements could leave gaps in leadership at critical moments. While interim U.S. Attorneys can be appointed from within each office, the lack of long-term leadership could affect decision-making on major cases.

A Political Strategy or a Standard Shake-Up?
The timing and nature of the firings have led some to speculate about the administration’s motives. Trump’s return to the presidency has been marked by an aggressive effort to consolidate control over the executive branch, particularly within the Justice Department. Some critics argue that the move to purge Biden-appointed U.S. Attorneys is part of a broader strategy to ensure that only loyalists remain in key law enforcement positions.

“This is about installing people who will follow the administration’s directives without question,” said one former DOJ official who spoke on condition of anonymity. “The Justice Department is supposed to operate independently, but this kind of move makes it clear that the White House wants more control over prosecutions.”

Others, however, argue that the decision simply reflects a standard political transition. “Every president wants their own team in place, especially when it comes to U.S. Attorneys who handle major criminal and civil cases,” said former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti. “It’s not unusual for a new president to clean house, though the method used here is certainly more abrupt than in past transitions.”

What Happens Next?
With a growing number of U.S. Attorneys either fired or forced to resign, the next question is who will take their place. The White House has not yet released a list of potential replacements, but sources within the administration suggest that Trump may move quickly to install acting U.S. Attorneys in key jurisdictions while awaiting Senate confirmation for permanent appointments.

The abrupt terminations have also sparked speculation about whether the administration’s actions could face legal challenges. While presidents have the authority to replace U.S. Attorneys, the manner in which these firings were conducted—without notice or a transition plan—could invite scrutiny from Congress and the courts.

For now, the Justice Department remains tight-lipped, with no official statement issued in response to inquiries about the terminations. Some Democrats have already voiced their concerns about the move, with members of the House Judiciary Committee calling for an investigation into whether political considerations played a role in the decision.

As the situation unfolds, legal experts warn that the mass firings could have long-term implications for the independence of the Justice Department. Whether this is a routine transition or a sign of deeper political maneuvering remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: President Trump is wasting no time in reshaping the federal law enforcement apparatus to fit his vision for his second term.