The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal courts cannot review visa revocations related to sham marriages, affirming that such decisions are at the discretion of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The unanimous decision clarified that while courts can review initial visa denials, they cannot intervene once a visa has been revoked. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson emphasized DHS’s broad authority under the relevant statute. The case, Bouarfa v. Mayorkas, involved a U.S. citizen whose husband’s visa was revoked due to a fraudulent marriage. Immigration advocates warn the ruling could burden migrants further and limit judicial oversight, while critics, including the ACLU, argue it may allow constitutional violations to go unchecked. The decision also impacts ongoing discussions about immigration enforcement and border security.