Supreme Court Rejects Dispute Over Pennsylvania Mail-In Ballots

The Supreme Court has opted not to consider a challenge from civil and voting rights organizations aimed at overturning Pennsylvania’s stipulation that mail-in ballots must feature a handwritten date on the outer envelope. The organizations contended that this requirement is superfluous and has resulted in the disqualification of legitimate ballots. The justices declined to review a lower court’s decision that upheld this requirement, dismissing the argument that it contravenes federal law, which forbids the rejection of ballots due to paperwork errors that are “not material” to assessing a voter’s eligibility, as reported by Reuters.

In 2024, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Philadelphia, determined that although the date requirement “serves little apparent purpose”—since it is not utilized to confirm whether a ballot was received on time—it remains legally valid. The court explained that the 1964 Civil Rights Act pertains to voter registration rules that establish eligibility to vote, rather than to the submission process of ballots for counting.

Pennsylvania, a pivotal swing state in presidential elections, once again proved to be crucial last year. Now-President Donald Trump won the state against Democratic opponent and former Vice President Kamala Harris in November, reversing his previous defeat to then-President Joe Biden four years prior.

Related Posts

Why It Matters to Understand the Difference Between Store-Bought and Farm-Raised Beef

When it comes to the food on your plate, not all beef is created equal. Understanding the difference between store-bought and farm-raised beef can help you make…

The Day I Learned What True Friendship Really Looks Like

When my 5-year-old son passed away in 2020, my world grew quiet in a way I still struggle to describe. My closest friend tried to comfort me,…

The Phone Call My Husband Never Answered—and the Lesson We Learned

My husband responded 10 hours later, and my brother told him, “She didn’t make it.” Then my husband… rushed into the maternity ward completely pale, shaking, and…

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal of a Massachusetts middle-schooler who was barred from wearing a T-shirt reading “There are only two genders.

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a Massachusetts student’s challenge to a school ban on wearing “There are only two genders” T-shirts. Justices Clarence Thomas and…

“A Life-Altering Choice: A Heartfelt Story After 30 Years of Marriage”

The morning that should have marked our thirtieth wedding anniversary, I did something even I hadn’t fully pictured until the words slipped out: I told Zack I…

A Small Gesture That Showed Me How Much He Really Cares

My husband went to the supermarket, and before he left, I asked him to buy me sanitary pads. When he came back, he placed the exact same…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *